Think Wood: Tell us about your role at Trivers.
Amanda McAllister: I joined Trivers in 2016 as an architectural designer and am currently a project manager and associate. When I joined the Green Team [a Trivers group focused on sustainability efforts], the focus at that point in time was really on business operations—things like recycling and purchasing policies. But we recognized really quickly that we had a much bigger opportunity for an impact through our work. From that point on we made a very intentional effort to incorporate sustainability into our design process.
We’re a small firm of about 36 employees, which includes architects and interior designers. There was a pivotal ownership transition in 2015. The new owners aimed to be an Architect 50 firm. In 2016, we submitted to Architect 50, but scored lower in sustainability than we would have liked. The silver lining was that it led to a commitment to boosting our focus on sustainability within the firm. That’s when we signed the AIA 2030 Commitment, marking the beginning of our exciting sustainability journey.
Was part of that commitment finding people like you to add more focus to sustainability?
Yes, the firm’s leadership has been great about letting people explore their passions and has encouraged a cultural shift to embedding sustainability into our firm. I joined the Green Team here and we pushed for more sustainability in our design process, beyond just LEED projects and business operations. Our first year of commitment in 2016 was just about submitting data to the Design Data Exchange. The Green Team took over reporting and we aimed to report on all of our projects. Now, our goal is 100% energy models with our submissions, using tools like Insight, a Revit plugin. We are beginning to think more and more about embodied energy and the role wood can play in that.
Has sustainability always been a passion for you, especially in architecture?
Yes, I’ve always been passionate about sustainability. My focus has been on adaptive reuse and historic renovation work, which is challenging for high-performance buildings. But now the conversation includes embodied carbon, and we’re getting metrics to understand the benefits of renovation in terms of embodied carbon.
Why is it important to consider both operational and embodied energy?
Energy modeling helps us understand predictive energy performance and optimize our designs for future emissions-saving operations. Without an energy model, there’s a lot of variation in performance. Energy modeling is the best tool we have to predict and improve operational carbon. But as a sector, it’s quickly becoming apparent that it’s not enough to consider just operational energy. Reducing embodied energy can significantly lower a building’s overall carbon footprint. Wood, as a building material, is inherently low in embodied energy compared to materials like steel or concrete. It also has natural insulating properties, which can reduce the operational energy needed for heating and cooling, complementing its low embodied energy.